Reproduction:
1. svn mv .../foo/bar .../foo/baz
(commited revision 100)
2. svn co -r 50 .../foo/bar/
3. svn co -r 50 .../foo/baz/
Actual result:
With svn 1.2.6 (from svk Mac package), step 2 gives:
svn: REPORT request failed on '/my/repo/!svn/bc/421/foo/bar'
svn: '/my/repo/!svn/bc/421/foo/bar' path not found
while step 3 works
With svn 1.1.4 from fink, step 2 works, while step 3 gives:
svn: URL '.../foo/baz' doesn't exist
So, the behaviour is completely inversed.
Expected result:
I would argue that the behaviour of svn 1.1 (from fink) is correct,
although I don't mind both ways to work. Step 2 not working is
definitely broken, though - at revision 50, it was foo/bar/, not foo/baz/.
Severity:
I had quite some difficulty with a coworker the other day when I was
instructing him (he's new to svn) via Jabber (me using svn 1.1 from fink
and him using svn 1.2.x on Windows).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 10 23:02:49 2005