[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is this correct behavior for svn cat?

From: Tom Mornini <tmornini_at_infomania.com>
Date: 2005-09-06 09:50:39 CEST

Thanks to both gents with the same answer.

One huge issue I'm hoping will be resolved some day is
the difficulty of finding deleted files in old revisions.

Shouldn't I (in a perfect world, or if I submitted the
patch myself...) be able to do:

svn log URL

and see the log entries for that URL if it ever existed?

-- Tom Mornini

On Sep 5, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Madan U Sreenivasan wrote:

> The problem might be similar to
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2276
> as in using file@rev might work, while '-r rev' looks at the working
> copy alone...

On Sep 5, 2005, at 10:42 PM, Raman Gupta wrote:

> Since you are looking at a repository URL, try the svn cat URL@REV
> form:
> svn cat svn+ssh://.../docs/video.pdf_at_54

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 6 09:52:56 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.