On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 12:59, Leon Zandman wrote:
> > This might work out in a software dev case... but not in
> > cases described above. How can a technical person decide
> > whether a work of art ( or whatever artifact the end user has
> > created) is worthy of checking in, unless he is a man of the
> > trade himself?!
>
> What made you think the technical person has to decide anything?
------------------------------------------------------------------
+ On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 12:16, Leon Zandman wrote:
+ [snip]
+ I have to submit my changes (patches) to one
+ of the repository maintainers who will then decide if they commit it.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats why!!
> When an
> artist feels his work is ready for a commit (this might be the case at
> the end of each working day) he contacts the repository maintainer, who
> will then have to commit the work, possibly even without looking at it.
> This isn't about adding an extra decision layer in the process, but it's
> about delegating the "very difficult" task of managing an SCM repository
> to someone who knows how to handle it.
Isn't auto-versioning better?
Cheers,
Maddy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 6 09:42:33 2005