[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: fsfs and scaleability

From: Georg Viehöver <viehoever_at_sigma-c.de>
Date: 2005-08-18 15:07:46 CEST

We have a repository with approx. 10000 files , a full checkout is approx. 2 GB large, approx. 2000 commits to date. FSFS has not had any scalability issues, as long as a single commit (the changes only) is smaller than 2 GB. Scalability is an issue with svn ci, because it has to check which of those 10000 files changed, which can take a few minutes.


        From: Oliver Pajonk [mailto:oliver.pajonk@gmail.com]
        Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:50 AM
        To: Kenneth.S.Brooks@chase.com
        Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
        Subject: Re: fsfs and scaleability
        I remember that someone did a performance comparison between bdb and fsfs some time ago and posted his results to this list, but I have no time to search the archives now for this. It must have been a short time after fsfs was integrated into svn. Maybe you can find it.
Received on Thu Aug 18 15:28:49 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.