I don't think the history of the new file is linked to the history of
the file with old name.
From: Feyza Esmer [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: 18 May 2005 08:18
To: Tim Alsop; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: RE: svn rename & move ?
I want to add one more question to this, does svn keep the history of
the file when renaming or moving? it should be, right?
Thanks in advance..
From: Tim Alsop [mailto:Tim.Alsop@CyberSafe.Ltd.UK]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:10 AM
Subject: svn rename & move ?
I wanted to check my understanding of the rename operation
provided by some svn clients (e.g. Tortoise SVN). When I use the
TortoiseSVN rename option it is not actually renaming the file, but
instead adding a new file with the required new name, and deleting the
old file, so when I commit my WC changes the repository looks how I
wanted. If this is correct, then I have a concern - see below :
If I have a very large file in my WC I am aware that normally
only changes are saved in the repository rather than a complete copy of
the new revision to this file. This makes the space usage in the
repository very efficient and has many other advantages. However, if I
rename this large file the entire file is copied to the repository again
so "space used = filesize * 2". If I later decide to rename the
directory that my file(s) reside the space used is again increased and
there is also no easy way to track in the repository what a file used to
be called, or where it was previously located, and hence look at the
change revisions on a specific file.
So, if my above assumptions are correct, I wonder if there are
any plans to add a 'real rename' and a 'real move' to the svn product ?
Received on Wed May 18 09:19:57 2005