Re: Another request for obliterate...

On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:40:58AM -0600, Joshua Jensen wrote:
> In fact, it's a very common practice to do what we're doing, allowing
> the underlying SCM to snapshot each and every build.

Actually, I don't think it is. Most "best practices" documents advise
storing only things that cannot be regenerated. I've never seen it cause
anything but problems in the long term.

> In any case, your idea does bring up a system we once tried to create with
> SCons. SCons, as you might be aware, has a fantastic network cache system,

See, I was thinking that I knew about a system that would do *just* what
you wanted (well, seemed to want), but I couldn't come up with the name.
But apparently you've been down that path.

Steve

-- 
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask
about Exchange Server next.
                           -- (Stolen from the net)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org