[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: SVN com objects

From: Gary Lusso <lussog_at_msn.com>
Date: 2005-04-06 21:22:25 CEST

Are these the com objects?

Directory of C:\SVN_Download\subversion-1.1.3\subversion\bindings\com

4/01/2005 06:30 PM <DIR> .
4/01/2005 06:30 PM <DIR> ..
2/16/2003 12:41 PM 1,926 dlldatax.c
4/19/2004 03:38 PM 1,532 dlldatax.h
4/19/2004 03:38 PM 6,203 MarshalArray.h
2/31/2003 08:01 AM 2,388 misc.cpp
2/16/2003 12:41 PM 1,252 misc.h
1/03/2004 08:52 AM 544 resource.h
2/31/2003 08:01 AM 1,067 StdAfx.cpp
4/19/2004 03:38 PM 2,044 StdAfx.h
3/17/2004 04:09 PM 8,539 SVN.cpp
4/19/2004 03:38 PM 3,889 SVN.h
1/03/2004 08:52 AM 578 SVN.rgs
2/31/2003 08:01 AM 4,307 SVNCOM.cpp
1/03/2004 08:52 AM 752 SVNCOM.def
1/03/2004 08:52 AM 3,135 SVNCOM.idl
2/31/2003 08:01 AM 2,887 SVNCOM.rc
1/03/2004 08:52 AM 245 SVNCOMps.def
1/03/2004 08:52 AM 406 SVNCOMps.mk
2/31/2003 08:01 AM 2,277 SVNStatus.cpp
2/16/2003 12:41 PM 2,906 SVNStatus.h
1/03/2004 08:52 AM 595 SVNStatus.rgs
2/16/2003 12:41 PM 2,264 svn_comCP.h

>From: Robert Hunter <robert.hunter@gen-i.co.nz>
>To: users@subversion.tigris.org
>Subject: RE: SVN com objects
>Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:34:19 +1200
>
>Max Bowsher wrote:
> > Gary Lusso wrote:
> >> Are there com objects for the Windows version od svn?
> >
> > No.
> >
>
>It would be nice to have Subversion's interface exposed through COM;
>it would allow ASP code to interact with Subversion without relying
>on wrapping the commandline.
>
>(For those who aren't familiar with COM, it's a "language independent"
>Microsoft Windows technology for component-oriented development, like
>CORBA. Providing a COM interface would be much the same as providing
>bindings for VBScript, JScript, etc)
>
>Exposing Subversion's interface through COM would be (as far as I know)
>non-trivial, though, so I don't really expect anyone to put the time
>and effort in for this -- I imagine that for most projects, wrapping
>the command line or using a different platform are more obvious options.
>
>I don't think that SWIG supports COM IDL as a target, or even if it
>would be practical to add that sort of support. If I was to attempt
>something like this, I'd probably use the SWIG-generated Python bindings
>together with Python's win32all COM support. It would be an extra
>layer, though, and probably not an ideal long-term solution.
>
>Just thinking out loud :-)
>
>--
>Robert Hunter
>
>*****************************************************************************
>This communication, including any attachments, is confidential.
>If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it
>- please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy
>or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it,
>Thank you.
>Please note that this communication does not designate an information
>system
>for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002
>******************************************************************************
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 6 23:09:46 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.