Mark Parker wrote:
>
> Scott Palmer wrote:
>> I think .Net specific bindings would be useful to even less people than
>> straight COM. I believe the typical COM stuff is still well supported
>> in .Net, but not having done .Net and no desire to start, I don't know
>> for sure.
>>
>> Scott
>
> Honestly, I think that the MOST useful thing that could be done
> bindings-wise on win32 is to teach the build process to spit out .dll
> files for the svn libraries. Pretty much any development environment on
> Windows can make calls to .dll libraries.
>
> Mark
That's true, but generally only for simple function signatures. Somehow I
suspect dealing with pools and batons via the VB Declare syntax wouldn't be
much fun, though I suppose it's probably not impossible for the dedicated
(or is that committed?) psycho.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 6 20:10:00 2005