I would like to know if subversion is capable of reviews, where code
commited would be 'held' until it was reviewed by at least 2 or 3 people.
This would be similar to the 'Votes' I saw mentioned in subversion
'HACKING',
however, I don't find anything about 'votes' in the source or anywhere else.
And of course track which reviewers reviewed each change.
Does anyone have another similar review module/add-on?
Thankyou!
Mark
I saw a mention of 'Votes' in:
./www/cvs-changelog.html
./STATUS
./HACKING
Here's an example, probably as complex as an entry would ever get:
* r98765 (issue #56789)
Make commit editor take a closure object for future mindreading.
Justification: API stability, as prep for future enhancement.
Notes: There was consensus on the desirability of this feature in
the near future; see thread at http://... (Message-Id: blahblah).
Concerns: Vetoed by jerenkrantz due to privacy concerns with the
implementation; see thread at http://... (Message-Id: blahblah)
Votes:
+1: ghudson, bliss
+0: cmpilato
-0: gstein
-1: jerenkrantz
A change needs three +1 votes from full committers (or partial
committers for the involved areas), and no vetoes, to go into A.B.x.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 15 08:12:50 2005