[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Two windows bugs

From: Dassi, Nasser <NDassi_at_141xm.com>
Date: 2005-02-21 05:03:46 CET

I have not written in weeks, but I feel compeled to share as well (being a software developer myself).
I agree 99% with your statements Karl, except for the 'purview' remark. Using Subversion highlights the bug, although it is not within SVN's purview to rectify this. Just like API's, using SVN exposes limitations and malfunctions in other application layers -- and it is currently beyond your objectives to overthrow the Neon project to rectify this; currently, as Brane has expressed, the Neon dev's are first responsible. Should Neon chose to ignore it, then Neon would then provide a less-than-adequate app layer for SVN to utilize; and only then would it be reasonable for SVN to hijack the Neon project to rectify the bug :o) I obviously sympathize with Brane on this one.
With regards to the expectation for perfection, I am discouraged with Mr. Washburn's utopian expectations considering his [seemingly respectible] background and his geographical proximity to my own abode; but I digress :o)
Brane, you're not alone :o)

        -----Original Message-----
        From: kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net on behalf of kfogel@collab.net
        Sent: Sun 2/20/2005 6:04 PM
        To: Monks, Peter
        Cc: Geoffrey A. Washburn; users@subversion.tigris.org
        Subject: Re: Two windows bugs

        "Monks, Peter" <peter.monks@vignette.com> writes:
> > I'm not sure passing the buck is the right solution here.
> So you're suggesting that the Subversion developers should support a
> piece of software (Neon) which they are in no way responsible for
> developing?
> If so, I'm having some Windows security issues that I'd like you to
> solve for me... ...and no buck passing, please. ;-)
        Oy, oy, let's please not jump on Geoff :-).
        I found his tone a bit blunt too, but his basic philosophy I agree
        with. We, the Subversion developers, chose Subversion's dependencies.
        A bug in a dependency that causes a bug in Subversion therefore falls
        within our purview, if we want it to.
        However, we can certainly choose to ignore it, as Geoff himself said,
        and that's exactly what we're doing here. I have no problem with
        that, and -- talk of "responsibility" notwithstanding -- Geoff clearly
        has no problem with it either.
        To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
        For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Mon Feb 21 05:08:04 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.