Re: rapidsvn

Steve Cohen <scohen@javactivity.org> wrote on 01/31/2005 09:16:50 PM:

> I asked a question about subeclipse here and was told this wasn't the
> place. After using it for awhile I find it truly isn't ready for
> primetime. But that's not the point of this post.

I do not recall a single post from you on the Subclipse mailing lists. How
did you come to this conclusion? Did you try it with Eclipse 3.x?
Development of the 2.x version ceased a long time ago.

In my opinion, Subclipse is extremely close to 1.0 quality. There are a
couple of features we need to finish, but I do not consider them
essential. The biggest problem is that Subclipse needs JavaHL, and many
Linux users seem to have trouble building it themselves and the
distributions generally do not package it.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 1 14:39:10 2005