Re: svn:internals (was: Re: svn:externals Are checkouts atomic?)

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 09:20:16AM -0500, Scott Palmer wrote:
> My description was incomplete. A and B are being developed together in
> parallel. A method is added to A because it is immediately needed in
> B, or a new code in B is added to accommodate for changes made in A
> literally seconds earlier.

Then they are not, in fact, seperate projects, and treating them as such
is causing you pain.

I understand that your intent is that they will, someday, be seperate,
and the interface to A will stabilize. Why not wait for that day, and
then move A outside of B, and set up externals then?

Which is not to say that the feature you envision wouldn't be useful,
only that since it's not there, there's a reasonable alternative to
fighting with Subversion.

Steve

-- 
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask
about Exchange Server next.
                           -- (Stolen from the net)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org