On Jan 16, 2005, at 6:54 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:38:12 -0500, Mike Laster
> <mike@marketocracy.com> wrote:
>> I've started evaluating Subversion recently in preparation for
>> migrating from CVS. I've noticed that running 'svn status' is very
>> slow. It is even slower than
>> running 'svn update' which actually has to talk to the server across
>> the network.
>>
>> I have a work area with 16597 files in it.
>>
>> svn update runs in about 17 seconds (in best case mode where my work
>> area is already up to date)
>>
>> svn status takes 3 minutes and 15 seconds to tell me that I have no
>> local modifications. Even repeated runs (to allow for disk caching)
>> don't speed it up noticeably.
>>
>> This is Using version 1.1.2 on OS X 10.3.7.
>>
>> This seems very slow for an entirely local operation. Especially
>> since
>> it seems like update has to do even more work, but can do it faster.
>
> Recently a number of speedup commits have been made. Could you try to
> see if trunk is faster for you?
I built the trunk yesterday and the performance was about the same.
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Sun Jan 16 16:26:18 2005