Re: Performance Question
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-01-10 15:18:54 CET
On Jan 10, 2005, at 1:11 AM, Hari Kodungallur wrote:
Yes, this is well-known. There's not much you can do.
Our collective experience is that 'svn co' is about 1.5x slower than
However, svn does many other things faster than cvs.
> --> if running the svnserve protocol has any effect.
Yes, svnserve is much faster than http. It's a stateful protocol,
> --> what the performance numbers are when using FSFS vs Berkeley DB.
Experience shows that FSFS is often a bit faster than BDB.
> Basically, we would like to move a large repository from CVS to SVN,
Why, because people are running 'svn checkout' every day? :-)
If so, you're doing something very odd. The normal usage is that you
(And that's when you start seeing SVN speed advantages over CVS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.