Re: Why --force with mv?

On Dec 20, 2004, at 11:23 PM, Jack O'Quin wrote:
>
> I think he's suggesting that since the user has made a copy the
> modified working file, nothing really gets lost. So, the `rm' part of
> the `mv' operation could probably just assume the --force option in
> that case. Conceptually, `svn mv' == `svn cp && svn rm --force'.
> Since the copy must succeed before doing the remove, that should be
> safe enough (AFAICT).
>

Ahh, that's a good idea! Maybe post the idea to dev@ as a enhancement
request?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 21 15:11:39 2004