[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn log questions

From: François Beausoleil <fbeausoleil_at_ftml.net>
Date: 2004-12-10 17:05:28 CET

On 10/12/2004 10:31, trlists@clayst.com wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2004 Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>> svn commit foo.c
>> svn log
>>You'd think that 'svn log' would show you the commit to foo.c that you
>>just made, right? After all, that's what CVS does. But it doesn't...
>>not without running 'svn up' first. It's been the subject of much
>>debate, but it's another example of 'consistency' winning out over 'do
>>what I mean'.
> I'll give you that last point :-).
> Anyway, the item above bit me a couple of times. Why is this? What is
> svn up doing that makes the log show the commit?

See "The Limitations of Mixed Revisions" in the Subversion book:

Hope that helps,

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Fri Dec 10 17:13:56 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.