>>> Noah Slater wrote:
>>>> When browsing a svn repos though a user-agent the HTML documents
>>>> served are NOT valid HTML and do not even include a DOCTYPE.
Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> Granted, they do not include a DOCTYPE, but the W3C validator says
>>> that a directory listing generated by mod_dav_svn 1.1.1 is valid
>>> HTML 4.01 Transitional except for the missing DOCTYPE.
>>>
>>> So.... what's this invaldity you refer to?
Noah Slater wrote:
> Lack of a DOCTYPE is invalid no matter what SGML based markup language
> you are using.
>
> User-agents WILL assume such things, but they only do this to overcome
> invalid documents.
>
> Simply because most user-agents are able to process this invalid
> "tag-soup" does not mean it is any more valid.
Your previous statement implied there was additional invalidity besides the
missing doctype. I could not find any. Do you care to clarify?
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 10 16:47:00 2004