[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: another repository layout

From: Niko Sams <ns_at_vivid-planet.com>
Date: 2004-12-02 17:19:27 CET

Steve Greenland wrote:

>But really, you shouldn't. Revision numbers don't mean anything, any
>more than CVS file revision numbers meant anything.
>
Ok, if they don't mean aynthing it shouldn't be a problem... I hope the
developers working with the
repository don't have a problem with that :D

>OTOH, I would suggest that if the projects are independent, you
>might find a structure like this more useful:
>
>ProjectA/trunk
>ProjectA/branches
>ProjectA/tags
>ProjectB/trunk
>ProjectB/branches
>ProjectB/tags
>[etc.]
>
>
I think we don't need that - we only used for one Project once a
branch... we are working only
on websites and the changes have to go online immideately...
And tags we used never...

If we should ever i can easily move the structure...

>Now, there may be other reasons to split into multiple repos, such as
>different access requirements, or backup size, or purely management
>issues, but I wouldn't base my decision on revision numbers at all.
>
actually there are no other reasons...

Thanks for your help, I know now what to do :D
Niko

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 2 17:17:23 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.