Re: svn commit/checkout performance issues (P5)
From: Sergey Bogdanov <Serge.Bogdanov_at_intel.com>
Date: 2004-12-01 22:45:31 CET I was doing more experiments. First of all as it turned out, subversion was initially built with fsfs support only. I spent some time to add bdb 4.2.52 suppoprt to it and ran some experiments on different configurations. The size of the clients after the last update was 899,576K (du -sk). Here are the results: nosync sync fsfs ====================================================== (client: nfs) import 8:42.89 16:07.87 2:14.71 rep size(k) 403,756 403,760 181,112 checkout 20:12.19 22:39.56 17:43.4 add --force 3:11.6 3:13.80 3:06.98 commit 57:59.91 1:00:44.99 45:00.68 !!! rep size(k) 798,128 798,132 310,080 ===================================================== So, the client was on a nfs site. The most interesting is that 'fsfs' has the best times and repository sizes. Can you tell me why you switched over to the berkley db? I also noticed that putting client workspace on a local disk produced much better performance. I am going to repeate the test sequence from above in the local-disk client mode. Brandon Ehle wrote:
-- >> Sergey Bogdanov INTEL massachusetts HD2-2/246 77 Reed Rd, Hudson, MA 01749 Tel: (978) 553-2724--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org Received on Wed Dec 1 23:27:46 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.