Re: svn 1.1.2 candidate r11708

Adam D. Moss wrote:
> Ah, I may have understood the meaning of 'candidate' here.
> The layout of the STATUS doc implies that these revisions are
> the candidates for 1.1.2, but I suspect that what is meant
> is that these are revisions that are in the candidate for 1.1.2
> (whew).
>
> Move along, nothing to see here...

No, your first supposition was correct - the revisions are candidates for
1.1.2

However, don't worry, because candidates are virtually always approved.

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 1 21:21:06 2004