[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CVS/SVN comparison

From: Glenn Maynard <g_sub_at_zewt.org>
Date: 2004-10-25 10:44:10 CEST

On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:44:00AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> As long as CVS is singled out in the "SVN is a replacement for"
> promotions I think that my expectation (i.e. SVN is CVS with better
> implementation and some extensions) is justified.

You confused the word "replacement" for the much narrower phrase
"drop-in replacement". They are not the same. Subversion is a
replacement for CVS; it is not a drop-in replacement, and doesn't
claim to be.

-- 
Glenn Maynard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 25 10:45:09 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.