Re: CVS/SVN comparison

On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:44:00AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> As long as CVS is singled out in the "SVN is a replacement for"
> promotions I think that my expectation (i.e. SVN is CVS with better
> implementation and some extensions) is justified.

You confused the word "replacement" for the much narrower phrase
"drop-in replacement". They are not the same. Subversion is a
replacement for CVS; it is not a drop-in replacement, and doesn't
claim to be.

-- 
Glenn Maynard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org