[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: BDB vs. FSFS

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2004-10-19 11:16:29 CEST

On Tuesday 19 October 2004 03:16, S.Ramaswamy wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 12:36, Nik Derewianka wrote:
[snip]
> > We do multimedia development for cd's and dvds - big projects with
> > lots of files. Using svn with bdb via apache2 on a win2k3 server, we
> > havent had any problems as yet during the trials (only just ramping
> > up to full production team now). The only annoying thing i have
> > found for large projects is getting rid of the .svn folders when you
> > have lots of nested folders and you have to prep the project for a
> > disk image. Currently i do a search on the project folder for
> > '.svn', select just the folders in the results pane and delete.. but
> > that doesnt work as nicely as possible (windows is the culprit here -
> > nothing to do with svn). Would be nice if tortoise had a 'Strip .svn
> > folders' option.
>
> If you are trying to get a clean copy of your tree, minus the '.svn'
> directories, then 'svn export' does the job.

I think he's saying that he's got a large working copy, and he's trying
not to duplicate it on-disk. Unfortunately, the best way to do that is
just as Nik described, removing the .svn directories. I wonder if we
could beef up the export interface a little and allow 'svn export . .
--force' to do the right thing here.

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 19 11:16:55 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.