From: Tom McMillen [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: 28 September 2004 11:43
> > This pre-commit hook will also look at user entered text (i.e. the name
> > the copied directory) to identify stuff that should not be
> > committable. So,
> > what happens if I typo the name of my tag (e.g.
> > /repos/tagss/mytagwhatever).
> > Now I have created a copy that isn't equivalent to a tag because my
> > pre-commit hook is only looking for /repos/tags/*.
> so what if...
> svn tag repos/trunk/myproject mytagwhatever
> if svn tag could go to a pre-commit hook that could manage the tags
> ensure that mytagwhatever tag goes to /repos/tags our poor typing skills
would be less of a problem?
> > Doing anything on user entered text is always going to be prone to
> > That is why you code systems up to perform common operations and
> > common restrictions.
> Agreed, but could this extended functionality possibly not need to be part
of the core svn system?
> (I think I'm looking for a third way where people who want tags can have
them and those that don't,
> don't install the additions....)
I guess I just cannot understand how anybody can accept that a source
control system can be complete without being able to reference a frozen
version of the code without having to resort to either magic numbers (the
global revision numbers) or examining log outputs.
I can see that the functionality can be implemented with pre-commit hooks,
command aliases, etc. etc. I just think it would be so much simpler if you
could have a single command that didn't involve having to install any hooks
that created a locked copy.
I, personally, do not consider it acceptable to be forced to use additional
hooks and scripts in order to achieve what I consider to be a fairly simple,
but essential, part of my source code control needs.
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Xenicom delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Tue Sep 28 12:51:14 2004