[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Project Organization

From: Wadsworth, Eric (Contractor) <wadswore_at_fhu.disa.mil>
Date: 2004-09-16 19:03:02 CEST

What we did is use a single repository for all of our projects, structured
as follows:

/project1/branches
/project1/tags
/project1/trunk

/project2/branches
/project2/tags
/project2/trunk

/project3/branches
/project3/tags
/project3/trunk

For us, all the projects except one are inactive (old stuff with no
development going on), so we have no need to connect across projects. If we
were to do this, I suppose the best way would be to have a seperate working
copy for each project, which would be built independantly.

However this is handled, I recommend having just one repository. It's a
great way to perform backups, too.

****
**** --- Eric Wadsworth, 520-533-2749
****

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bojan Resnik [mailto:resnikb@swissinfo.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:52 PM
> To: users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Project Organization
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am new to Subversion, having used VSS in the past. I have read the
> Subversion book, and I like the Subversion way of doing things.
>
> However, I am having thoughts about reorganizing the projects, and
> there is a conceptual issue which I cannot seem to resolve. Currently,
> all the projects are in a single VSS database, but it seems to me that
> it would be beneficial if each had its own Subversion repository. The
> problem is that there is set of common projects, and all other
> projects depend on at least one of these. The structure is similar to
> this:
>
> - shared
> - sh1
> - sh2
> ...
> - project1
> - project2
> ...
>
> Both project1 and project2 depend on sh1, while some other
> root-level projects have their own dependencies among the shared
> projects.
>
> Conceptually, it seems that all shared projects should go into one
> repository, and every project into a repository of its own. But,
> Subversion commands work only within a repository, so working with
> this layout would be a maintenance nightmare... Branching for a
> release version would include branching from two repositories, and
> many other tasks would require keeping track of two (or more) revision
> numbers of different repositories... Or maybe I have misunderstood
> something?
>
> Did anyone have similar problems, and what solution did you come up
> with?
>
> Regards,
> Bojan Resnik
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 16 19:05:04 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.