Doh!
My unfamiliarity with svn shines through. :)
That works perfectly for my purposes. Thanks to Patrick and Michael for
pointing it out.
/me goes to read the svn book again.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpilato@collab.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:22 AM
> To: Walt Armour
> Cc: 'users@subversion.tigris.org'
> Subject: Re: Getting list of tags/branches
>
>
> Walt Armour <WaltA@concur.com> writes:
>
> > The approach I'm looking for would just give a list of
> tags/branches,
> > period. My thought was to use 'svnlook tree' but on out
> repository it is
> > hideously slow (mainly because it is a massive amount of
> output). However,
> > if I could restrict the depth of the tree that is produced
> it may run quite
> > a bit faster and the resultant output would be more usable for this
> > particular purpose. Perhaps something like 'svnlook tree --depth 1
> > /my/repo/path /branches'.
>
> Why not just use the output of 'svn ls file:///path/to/repos/tags' +
> 'svn ls file:///path/to/repos/branches' ?
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 9 20:46:24 2004