[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

FSFS or Berkeley DB

From: Sean Moss-Pultz <sean_at_moss-pultz.com>
Date: 2004-08-27 05:20:12 CEST

Hopefully some of you guys could help guide me on this one....

I've read the document http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/info/fsfs and it
sounds much better than running Berkeley DB. But then comes the line
about immature code. This normally wouldn't really bother but we are
running Subversion as our *only* version control system for about 100
engineers. Like everyone, our code is extremely important. I would be
beheaded for proposing a radical new file system that corrupted our
data a later time :)

Yes either way I would have backups but restoring from backups can take
a long time. We have many repositories.

So my question is this. Would you use FSFS or Berkeley DB if you were



  • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Fri Aug 27 05:21:30 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.