Concerning Re: post-update hook?
John Peacock wrote on 7 Jun 2004, 7:10, at least in part:
> Jan Hendrik wrote:
> > update on a working copy used exclusively by the local web dev
> > server/for uploads to the live web server (as John Peacock just
> > suggests in another thread).
>
> To amplify a little what I suggested on the other thread, having an
> automatic update for a webserver is great for a development server
> (not so much for production sites).
Indeed, too many flaws can go online too quick! :-)
> But there is no reason that the production server can't also have its
> own working copy; just make that one a manual update. If you are into
> that sort of thing, you can even make specific release tags and then
> switch the production server WC to the next release tag (instead of
> using the HEAD revision exclusively). You have lots of options...
Well, that's a bit beyond our current scope as the production server
is hosted outside ... don't have direct access ... and remotely
updating a working copy over dial-in ... surely not the best of
things. But one of the many options will finally do about what I
want, as always.
Jan Hendrik
---------------------------------------
In memoriam Ronald Reagan:
You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
We will preserve for our children -
this, the last best hope of man on earth,
or we will sentence them to take the first step
into a thousand years of darkness.
If we fail, at least let our children and
our children's children say of us
we justified our brief moment here.
We did all that could be done.
-- Ronald Reagan, A Time For Choosing Speech, 1964
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 7 23:14:10 2004