[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Custom Win32 binaries

From: Steven Higgan <steven.higgan_at_orcon.net.nz>
Date: 2004-05-28 23:18:33 CEST

Cc to list:

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:e.huelsmann@gmx.net]
Sent: Saturday, 29 May 2004 3:35 a.m.
To: Steven Higgan
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Custom Win32 binaries

>> Could it have something to do with the fact that a lot of "windows
>> specific"
>> issues are not readily addressed - just an observation, so don't bite my
>> head off.

> You offended quite a number of people with this statement. (Not me
> personally.)

No offence is intended but it does help get the point across.

I am actually surprised the post made it to the list, other posts I have
sent went into the black hole that is the internet - go figure.

> could you please provide a list to substantiate when and how issues were
> not adequately addressed?

Sure this is only a single issue, but illustrates my point.
File-Name case issues, initially reported ages ago, reported more recently
by somebody who didn't give up - and after considerable debate now some work
has been done on it. Btw I am not wanting to re-hash the issue.

I do realize the nature of developing this product - most of the developers
use *nix, that itself makes it difficult as hell to test or even write
windows specific code. But then again your at 1.0, these "simple things"
should have already been dealt with.

Suppose it comes down to this - when in rome do as the romans do.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven H - 3rd Year B.I.T. Otago Polytechnic, Dunedin New Zealand

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:e.huelsmann@gmx.net]
Sent: Saturday, 29 May 2004 3:35 a.m.
To: Steven Higgan
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Custom Win32 binaries

> > For the life of me I can't figure out why did is such an "UN-official"
> > feature.
>
> Could it have something to do with the fact that a lot of "windows
> specific"
> issues are not readily addressed - just an observation, so don't bite my
> head off.

You offended quite a number of people with this statement. (Not me
personally.) If you want to make statements like these could you please
provide a list to substantiate when and how issues were not adequately
addressed?

Also, have you read the mailing list archive wrt this specific issue?

Thanks,

Erik.

-- 
+++ Jetzt WLAN-Router f|r alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++
GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 28 23:33:57 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.