Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
>On Thursday 27 May 2004 15.51, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>
>>I have decided to make available an unofficial build of the latest SVN
>>binaries for Windows that use _svn instead of .svn for the
>>administrative directory. Look in http://www.xbc.nu/svn/.
>>
>>The Subversion project has nothing to do with these binaries, I have
>>not tested them in any way, do not promise that they will work, will
>>not provide an installer, etc. etc. Here's an excerpt from the
>>README.txt file:
>>
>>
>
>How about making them at the same time as the ordinary binaries and
>include them in the standard Windows installer (and also upload them on
>the Subversion site after all).
>
>
IIRC we've already decided that we won't do that, and I don't want to
reopen that discussion.
>TSVN have offered a _svn solution for a while without too much noise and
>trouble AFAIK.
>
>
Yes. That's their decision to make. Don't forget that TSVN is a
Windows-only project.
>It's a nice thing you are doing here and I think that the "_svn" binaries
>should be as avable as possible without making your server bleed IMHO.
>
>
Oh, I don't expect 10k downloads a day, or even 10k downloads overall.
So I won't bother with a better solution until bandwidh does become a
problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 27 16:25:37 2004