Re: out-of-date problem -- I don't get it

> kfogel@collab.net <kfogel@collab.net> [2004-05-18 18:05]:
>
> Lukas Ruf <ruf@rawip.org> writes:
> > Crawling the documentation led me to to 'svn update'.
> >
> > This however, resulted in 'reverts'. So, I interrupt this process
> > by
>
> How did running 'svn update' result in reverts? That should never
> happen; at the worst, you should get conflicts, but not reverts.
>

Please accept my apologies. Following your email, I tried again and
saw that subversion worked as it is expected.

>
> Running 'svn update' shouldn't lose your changes. We'd need more
> details to figure out why you felt it would, though...
>

I do not remember why I had the feeling svn would 'revert' -- maybe I
should leave the office.

Thanks!

wbr,
Lukas

-- 
Lukas Ruf           | Wanna know anything about raw |
<http://www.lpr.ch> | IP? -> <http://www.rawip.org> |
eMail Style Guide: <http://www.rawip.org/style.html>|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org