Re: apr updates within subversion.. update

apparently the problem may be in the apache 2.0.49 tree itself.

quote:
"I remember now we had a problem that APR_0_9_BRANCH wasnt re-tagged
from 2.0.49-rc2 to rc3, so this might be the problem."
endquote:

apache 2.0.50 is almost ready so its apr should be ok and we assume
that the updated one will be included with svn once released.

Rod

>>> "Rodney Crossman" <rodc@ravenetcomputers.com> 4/27/2004 12:48:38 PM
>>>
apparently there are a few fixes already in APR_0_9_BRANCH which are
not
in subversion, so they must have fetched before httpd 2.0.49 was
tagged....

This is what I was told from a fellow I am working with in porting svn
apache modules to netware.

Rod

>>> Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> 4/27/2004 12:05:53 PM >>>
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 12:00, Rodney Crossman wrote:
> How the APR is treated within subversion? Will it be updated from
the
> ASF APR repository in regular schedules, or when else?

Our general rule has always been: the svn release tarball ships with
the same apr included in the latest released apache tarball.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 27 21:21:46 2004