[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Current binary best practice?

From: news.gmane.org <clint_at_luminosindustries.com>
Date: 2004-04-27 20:18:18 CEST

Is there an issue for this? I think there are a lot of people who would
like to track the status of this feature.

Clint

"Branko ─Oibej" <brane@xbc.nu> wrote in message
news:408555BA.9070308@xbc.nu...
> Christoph Graf wrote:
>
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > I am searching for an intermediate solution for handling
> > human-non-readable files in a subversion repository as long
> > as locking is not available directly through subversion.
> >
> > My questions:
> >
> > - Are there best practices for this problem?
> >
> > - How do you handle this?
> >
> > - Has anybody written something (hooks?) for this issue?
> >
> >
>
> I came up against the same problem a few days ago. My tentative, short
> term solution is to write a pre-commit hook script that checks the paths
> in the commit against a registry of locked paths, and a CGI script (or
> similar) that allows users to manage this registry. In the absence of
> true locking, I think this is the best solution (although it's not very
> beautiful, I agree).
>
> Neither of these scripts has been written yet, as far as I know.
>
> My long-term solution is of course to get locking implemented, and I'm
> working on that, too. :-)
>
> -- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 27 21:21:04 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.