Re: Possible bug in keyword replacement (revisited, with examples)

Philip Martin wrote:
> John Peacock <jpeacock@rowman.com> writes:
>
>
>>Not really. If you dump the repository created using the reproduction
>>recipe given in the issue:
>>...
>>
>>You'll see that what is in the repository is not the expanded keyword,
>>but a stub that looks like an keyword (for the first two). foo3 does
>>not contain a keyword at all, and will not be expanded in the WC.
>
>
> All I meant by "expanded" is that it had not been "detranslated".
> Change foo3 to be "$Id: xxx $" and now it's a keyword and it shows up
> in the diff.
>

I just noticed that an additional commit will cleanse the taint (i.e. unexpand
the keywords in the repository), i.e. all files when dumped will contain $Id$
and nothing more. This is a more subtle bug...

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org