Re: Possible bug in keyword replacement (revisited, with examples)

John Peacock <jpeacock@rowman.com> writes:

> Not really. If you dump the repository created using the reproduction
> recipe given in the issue:
> ...
>
> You'll see that what is in the repository is not the expanded keyword,
> but a stub that looks like an keyword (for the first two). foo3 does
> not contain a keyword at all, and will not be expanded in the WC.

All I meant by "expanded" is that it had not been "detranslated".
Change foo3 to be "$Id: xxx $" and now it's a keyword and it shows up
in the diff.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org