RE: Communicating through the VC tool
From: <andy.glew_at_amd.com>
Date: 2004-04-03 00:23:28 CEST
> > An example of why I want the ability to
"cvs log" provides log messages on a per file basis.
Quite a while back, actually before CVS, I wrote
When CVS came along, somebody - well, bless my heart,
Karl: if you are the original author of cvs2cl.pl,
(Heck, even my "we're stuck with each other" email, which was
--- Anyway, bottom line: cvs2cl.pl, rcslog-merge, etc., take the per-file all-version log messages of RCS and CVS, and create a global all-file, all-versions view of the history. Because of hierarchy, per-subtree, all-file, all-versions is a possibility. By comparison, svn log provides a all-file per-"path-of-versions" view of the history. Also per-subtree, all-file, per-"path-of-versions" And my complaint is that per-subtree, all-file, all-versions can only be obtained with svn by getting the all-subtree, all-file, all-versions report, and then performing a transitive closure graph walk on it - not a simple grep. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Apr 3 00:24:05 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.