"Brian Beaudet" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I'm looking for suggestions on my repo layout. My company has several
> developers/non-developers (documents, QA, testing, etc.) who will be
> user Subversion for version control. We work on many projects at one
> time. I'm considering setting up many repositories one for each
> project. I was wondering what the experience of the user community out
> there is on this type of layout. I'll be doing the admin so it's up to
> me to determine the best layout.
I routinely use both the many-projects-in-one and the
one-project-per-repos setup. There are obviously pros and cons to
both. If you expect to ever need to copy stuff between projects
(while maintaining history), the one-repos approach is necessary.
Multiple repositories means maintaining multiple sets of hook scripts,
too. And if a future version of Subversion requires a dump/load
cycle, you have N repositories to dump and load instead of one giant
That said, many smaller repositories lessens the side-effect of some
breakage -- if some event causes the repository to lock up and need
recovery, at least only one repository is affected. Also, because the
many repos will be smaller than a single shared one, your backup and
restore granularity is easier to deal with. As for the many sets of
hook scripts, I suppose you could make each repo's hooks just be dumb
wrappers around some common hook-scripts shared by all repositories.
You should also consider the auth question. Depending on your access
method and auth setup, your may find one or the other of the layouts
Keep in mind, too, that you could use a mixed approach -- similar
projects can share a repos. You know, a sort of grouping effect.
Finally, the Subversion book authors do recommend that *regardless* of
the choice of many versus one repos, make it such that beneath each
"project root" there are "trunk", "tags", and "branches" directories.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Thu Mar 25 16:29:05 2004