RE: svnlook blame?

From: Jens Peters <jpeters7677_at_gmx.de>
Date: 2004-03-15 23:27:06 CET

>Nasty? Slower? 'svnlook repos' and 'svn file:///repos' are no different.
They're both reading the repository database
>files directly. I see no reason why one would be slower than the other, or
more "nasty".

Don't blame me :)
I'll post this in the WebSVN Mailing List.

Regards, Jens

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 15 23:27:40 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Allen Morgan: "RE: Stupid user question: Mapped drives mistake."
Previous message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: Stupid user question: Mapped drives mistake."
In reply to: Ben Collins-Sussman: "RE: svnlook blame?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]