Re: svnlook blame?

Jens Peters wrote:

> Ok, I understand what you mean, but since I'm not a developer of WebSVN
> I can't talk for the design decisions the WebSVN team made. But may be
> you can still consider add blame to svnlook, I think blame would fit
> into the meaning (it's just used for “peeking”) of svnlook too. :) (Yes,
> I like WebSVN (more than ViewCVS/ViewSVN), just missing blame there)

Sure, I think we all agree it would be nice for 'svnlook blame' to
exist. But I still don't understand why WebSVN can't run 'svn blame
file:///absolute/path/to/repos' just as easily. No working copy
required, and WebSVN already knows /absolute/path/to/repos, right?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 14 15:14:02 2004