[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Visual Studio.Net and Subversion - Will this make it into a release?

From: Kevin Williams <kevin_w69_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 2004-03-05 21:00:18 CET

<quote>.. whichever one gets there first ... </quote> Is there another? :)

Since this could be construed as a "compatiability issue" between the SCC
API provider and the IDE, there is a good chance we will decide to use a
custom compile of Subversion until the official source code includes the
needed flexibility. We may end up being the ones who submit the patch to
handle the working folder directory structure.

It shouldn't be that difficult to patch, since it is a platform-dependant
issue. UNIX-like platforms could use the existing ".svn" folder name, and
Win32 platforms could use "SVN". I don't have the Subversion source code
memorized, but I would be surprised if there isn't some kind of switching to
handle different socket implementations and/or threading implementations. If
this were done within the "official" source code, then each platform's build
Should Just Work (tm), and that would include tools that depend on
Subversion such as TortoiseSVN. The change would no longer break
compatibility between Subversion clients working in the same working folder.

That's my two cents, FWIW.

>From: Mark Phippard <MarkP@softlanding.com>
>To: "Bryan Andrews" <bandrews@trendinfluence.com>
>CC: users@subversion.tigris.org
>Subject: RE: Visual Studio.Net and Subversion - Will this make it into a
>release?
>Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:34:45 -0500
>
>I do not know who maintains the Win32 binaries and installer, but perhaps
>they could be persuaded to publish two versions of each release? One
>compiled with the defaults, and one where it was overridden to a name
>without a dot as the first character? I agree that a lot of Win32 users
>would have trouble compiling SVN and if a somewhat "official" alternate
>build were available it would satisfy a lot of users and help avoid these
>threads.
>
>Also, I think another concern is that while the FAQ tells you how to do
>this, it also discourages you from doing so without really saying why. For
>example, would tools like TortoiseSVN have problems with it?
>
>Finally, is there any possibility that the eventual SVN SCC provider,
>whichever one gets there first, can resolve this problem within the
>provider?
>
>Mark
>
>
>
>
>"Bryan Andrews" <bandrews@trendinfluence.com> wrote on 03/05/2004 02:18:08
>PM:
>
> > By the way, I don't mind waiting and working with fixes in the
> > meantime. I just need to know if there will be support for it ever
> > so I can make a smart decision here.
> >
> > I don't have the tools to fix this myself as I have never compiled a
> > c++ application. If I was a wiz at this I probably would not be
> > complaining, but alas we are a .net shop.
> >
> > If its just me I can work around this - which I already do - but I
> > am making decisions for an organization that I have to consider.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:e.huelsmann@gmx.net]
> > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:17 PM
> > To: Bryan Andrews
> > Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
> > Subject: RE: Visual Studio.Net and Subversion - Will this make it
> > into a release?
> >
> > > Wow. I looked at some of the previous threads before and thought I
> > > remembered that "no it wasn't going to make it into 1.0" but did not
> > > remember that it would never make it in.
> > >
> > > All we (those who use vs.net) are asking for is to be able to use
> > > working copies in directories that are compatible with VS.net.
> > >
> > > So are you speaking for the team on this? If so I guess I will have to
> > > explore other options which would be really disappointing.
> >
> > So what you're saying is that since the team says it's not going to put
>it
> > in, you won't use a piece of software which is otherwise working out
>great?
> > Even though you do have all the tools to fix this problem yourself?!
>Makes me
> > wonder....
> >
> >
> > bye,
> >
> >
> > Erik.
> >
> > --
> > +++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz
>+++
> > 100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee when you click here.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 5 21:00:44 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.