I do not know who maintains the Win32 binaries and installer, but perhaps
they could be persuaded to publish two versions of each release? One
compiled with the defaults, and one where it was overridden to a name
without a dot as the first character? I agree that a lot of Win32 users
would have trouble compiling SVN and if a somewhat "official" alternate
build were available it would satisfy a lot of users and help avoid these
Also, I think another concern is that while the FAQ tells you how to do
this, it also discourages you from doing so without really saying why. For
example, would tools like TortoiseSVN have problems with it?
Finally, is there any possibility that the eventual SVN SCC provider,
whichever one gets there first, can resolve this problem within the
"Bryan Andrews" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on 03/05/2004 02:18:08
> By the way, I don't mind waiting and working with fixes in the
> meantime. I just need to know if there will be support for it ever
> so I can make a smart decision here.
> I don't have the tools to fix this myself as I have never compiled a
> c++ application. If I was a wiz at this I probably would not be
> complaining, but alas we are a .net shop.
> If its just me I can work around this - which I already do - but I
> am making decisions for an organization that I have to consider.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:17 PM
> To: Bryan Andrews
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: Visual Studio.Net and Subversion - Will this make it
> into a release?
> > Wow. I looked at some of the previous threads before and thought I
> > remembered that "no it wasn't going to make it into 1.0" but did not
> > remember that it would never make it in.
> > All we (those who use vs.net) are asking for is to be able to use
> > working copies in directories that are compatible with VS.net.
> > So are you speaking for the team on this? If so I guess I will have to
> > explore other options which would be really disappointing.
> So what you're saying is that since the team says it's not going to put
> in, you won't use a piece of software which is otherwise working out
> Even though you do have all the tools to fix this problem yourself?!
> +++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz
> 100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Fri Mar 5 20:35:43 2004