[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Recommendations for a production svn server

From: J Wynia <jwynia_at_pragmapool.com>
Date: 2003-12-30 15:26:20 CET

While this is still arguably the prevailing "wisdom", I've watched my
uptimes on my Windows machines go up substantially over the last 2-3
years: especially for server machines. My WinXP Subversion server is
unavailable far more often for dump/load reasons than anything Windows
related. Even my main XP workstation usually goes 30-60 days without a
reboot and I put it through a lot of abuse. That's a far cry from the
nearly daily reboots for NT workstations I had before. Is it as good as
*nix uptimes of 1-2 years, etc.? No. However, if you're working with an
internal server that only gets used Mon-Fri and you can schedule things
like Windows Updates for weekends (once a month), the uptime/stability
shouldn't be a problem.

Wadsworth, Eric (Contractor) said:
> I prefer *nix boxen for servers, for stability reasons. But that's just
> me.
> ;)
>

-- 
J Wynia
Pragmapool, Inc.
www.pragmapool.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 30 15:27:21 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.