Branko ÄŒibej wrote:
> Ouch. I absolutely agree that the repeated copy/move restriction in the
> WC is annoying, but I'm pretty sure that any three-minute solution will
> create more problems than it fixes. Working copy management is
> _complicated_, and I don't think it makes sense to patch the WC library
> unless we fix a real bug (which this is not, BTW).
To avoid misunderstandings:
For the reasons explained in my previous emails,
I am sure that the proposed solution also is the "real"
and lasting solution!
It does NOT cause additonal problems at all!
(except implementation detail aspects I may be not aware of)
Only "accidentally" this seems to be also a simply
"three-minute" solution, which simply is good luck.
Definitely, as long as important people as you
don't agree that this solution is the right one
also on the long run, I agree that it definitely
shouldn't be done yet.
But I am quite sure that you will get convinced
as soon as you find time to think more in detail about it.
It would be really a pity if a simple solution
for an annoying problem is not included
only because of not being aware
of the solution being the right one. ;-)
Cheers,
Folker
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Dec 27 19:52:01 2003