[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: code reviewing and test enforcement?

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2003-11-30 14:29:30 CET

On Sunday 30 November 2003 08:18, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 05:45, John Szakmeister wrote:
> > I thought the reason for 'svnadmin lstxns/rmtxns' was because it is
> > possible to have a transaction lying around. If this is no longer the
> > case, why do we still have these commands?
> Because
> 1) bugs in libsvn_repos might accidentally leave a transaction lying
> around after an error,
> 2) if someone uses libsvn_fs directly, then it's definitely possible to
> have a long-lived transaction.

Ahhk yes, I forget that we allow people to use libsvn_fs directly. Thanks for
the enlightenment.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 30 14:25:32 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.