Re: code reviewing and test enforcement?

On Sunday 30 November 2003 08:18, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 05:45, John Szakmeister wrote:
> > I thought the reason for 'svnadmin lstxns/rmtxns' was because it is
> > possible to have a transaction lying around. If this is no longer the
> > case, why do we still have these commands?
>
> Because
>
> 1) bugs in libsvn_repos might accidentally leave a transaction lying
> around after an error,
>
> 2) if someone uses libsvn_fs directly, then it's definitely possible to
> have a long-lived transaction.

Ahhk yes, I forget that we allow people to use libsvn_fs directly. Thanks for
the enlightenment.

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 30 14:25:32 2003