Re: code reviewing and test enforcement?

On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 05:45, John Szakmeister wrote:

> I thought the reason for 'svnadmin lstxns/rmtxns' was because it is possible
> to have a transaction lying around. If this is no longer the case, why do we
> still have these commands?

Because

 1) bugs in libsvn_repos might accidentally leave a transaction lying
around after an error,

 2) if someone uses libsvn_fs directly, then it's definitely possible to
have a long-lived transaction.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 30 14:19:13 2003