[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion on RH9 vs RH 7.3

From: Marcin Gil <mgil_at_vernet.pl>
Date: 2003-10-30 21:50:59 CET

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:11:22 -0600
Zsolt.Domokos@seagate.com wrote:

> Gurus,
> If you need to choose to host svn on redhat 7.3 or 9 which one would
> you pick and why?
>
Not a guru :)
I think that svn doesn't rely that hard on 'distribution'
but more on services it provides.
Lately on this list there was a lightweight discussion why to change
apache from 2.0.47 to 2.0.48.. And since 2.0.48 contains lotsa fixes
even collab.net switched already :)

So I think, that if you can provide new apache, ssh and others -
distribution has no means.. but that's only my point of view.
And, btw.. 7.3 is quite old one :)

-- 
  Marcin Gil
    email#   mgil : vernet pl | GaduGadu ID# 185057
    JID# dentharg : chrome pl | 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 30 21:52:02 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.