[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 0.30.0 stability problems : not able to check in bigger pieces

From: David Good <dgood_at_fsautomation.com>
Date: 2003-10-07 23:50:11 CEST

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:43:32AM +0200, Roland Schwingel <Roland.Schwingel@onevision.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi...
>
> Jan Evert van Grootheest <j.grootheest@euronext.nl> wrote on 07.10.2003
> 09:59:45:
> > Roland,
> >
> > On linux, signal 11 usually indicates memory (hardware) problems...
> > I'd suggest using memtest (or was that memtest86) for a couple of days.
> The machine runs very stable. It has a uptime of 191 days. I can do
> memtest86 next weekend, but I do not suspect *any* hardware trouble. It
> runs sendmail, cvs and so on and everything stable as a rock. It has a
> loadfactor of max. ~0.5 and is very responsive. Hard drives could be faster
> for my taste but thats not the reason for this.

Signal 11 is the "segmentation violation" signal. While I suppose it
*could* mean you have hardware memory problems, I've never seen that to
be the case. Usually, you get a segmentation violation when you try to
dereference an invalid pointer.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 7 23:51:09 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.