Re: Current Updated Revision Number

At 12:32 PM +0100 9/9/03, Julian Foad wrote:
>Jack Repenning wrote:
>>
>>Hmmm ... but if we had some "keyword svn:reporevision" voodoo such
>>as we're discussing, that wouldn't work for your "write-only repo"
>>scenario either, would it? If you never update, the voodoo file
>>never gets updated..... unless we also require it to be updated by
>>any operation that changes the `svnversion` of the wc?
>
>Yup - quite true - bad example - not thinking clearly. Still, the
>point was that many people use Subversion in a very simplistic way...

Well, sure they do. But the point here is, this simplistic idea
doesn't seem to be congealing into a simplistic implementation ;-\.
It may be, in this case, that the simplistic users have to do a bit
of not-so-simplistic choosing among viable options.

-- 
-==-
Jack Repenning
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
o: 650.228.2562
c: 408.835-8090
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org