Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Marc Singer <elf@buici.com> writes:
>
>> I've read that cvs2svn is weak on these concepts, but there is the
>> presumption that it works for simple repositories. My experience
>> has been that it imports the cvs log files without their content. A
>> cvs2svn followed by a co of the trunk gives me a directory tree with
>> the right filenames and all files empty.
>
> Have you not run cvs2svn for 4 months? It works pretty well now, and
> even handles branches and tags. There are a number of edge-case bugs
> (all filed in issues), but on the whole, it's definitely pretty
> usable.
It *is* pretty usable, but all the problems not filed in issues. There are
at least two - the subject of my recent "[BUG+PATCH]" email, and another
instance of incorrect data appearing on branches, for which I have yet to
isolate a cause.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 29 23:26:39 2003