Re: Does cvs2svn work in the absence of branches or tags?

Marc Singer <elf@buici.com> writes:

> I've read that cvs2svn is weak on these concepts, but there is the
> presumption that it works for simple repositories. My experience
> has been that it imports the cvs log files without their content. A
> cvs2svn followed by a co of the trunk gives me a directory tree with
> the right filenames and all files empty.

Have you not run cvs2svn for 4 months? It works pretty well now, and
even handles branches and tags. There are a number of edge-case bugs
(all filed in issues), but on the whole, it's definitely pretty
usable.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 29 23:08:26 2003