[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: need help setting up svn+ssh://

From: Leeuw van der, Tim <tim.leeuwvander_at_nl.unisys.com>
Date: 2003-08-22 10:01:35 CEST

Hi,

This sounds to me, as a layman user, as a very good solution because it
avoids shellscript compatibility problems between Unix and Windows, and puts
such problems on a level (the C code) where the user doesn't see it).

with regards,

--Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: junkio@cox.net [mailto:junkio@cox.net]
Sent: vrijdag 22 augustus 2003 8:35
To: cmpilato@collab.net
Cc: Steve Williams; Michael Wood; users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: need help setting up svn+ssh://

>>>>> "cmpilato" == cmpilato <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:

cmpilato> "Steve Williams" <stevewilliams@kromestudios.com> writes:
>> Does using the umask hack adversely affect a non-SSH or inetd
>> svnserve process? If not, then it wouldn't hurt to use it. If it
>> would affect them, then I'm not sure what would be done.

cmpilato> That's good question to ask. If we agree that it's safe in all
cmpilato> circumstances to use the script, it would make sense to ship and
cmpilato> install the script with the svnserve process.

If so maybe calling umask(2) directly at the beginning of
svnserve binary, instead of shipping a wrapper, would be
cleaner. Better yet, do it with a command line switch perhaps,
so that situations that need it (e.g. svn+ssh) can turn it on?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 22 10:02:35 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.